MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405258277 · doi:10.52609/jmlph.v5i1.143

Maternal and Perinatal Outcome of Triplet Pregnancies in a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India: A Prospective Observational Study

2024· article· en· W4405258277 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Salima Wani, Fiza Amin, Shagufta Yasmeen Rather

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Medicine Law & Public Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCaesarean sectionObstetricsPregnancyObservational studyGestational ageProspective cohort studyGestationTertiary referral hospitalPediatricsBirth weightRetrospective cohort studySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The purpose of this study was to identify the present trends in maternal, foetal, and perinatal outcomes and complications associated with triplet pregnancy at a tertiary referral hospital in India. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over 18 months. All adult pregnant patients with ultrasound-confirmed triplet pregnancy were included. Patient demographics, measurements, and variables were recorded, with monitoring and follow-up at regular intervals. The primary endpoint of the analysis was to determine the maternal complications and perinatal outcomes associated with triplet pregnancy. Results: Thirty-four triplet pregnancies were included in this study. The majority, 70.7% (n=31) of these women, had conceived by assisted reproductive technique (ART), mostly in vitro fertilisation (IVF), 52.9% (n=18). The most common maternal complications encountered were pre-term labour, in 82.4% (n=28) of patients. Concerning gestational age at the time of delivery, 47.1% (n=16) of patients were near-term (34-36 weeks). The majority of pregnancies, 85.3% (n=29), were terminated by lower segment caesarean section (LSCS), 8.8% (n=3) were delivered vaginally, and the mean duration of maternal hospital stay was 4.6 days ±3.45 (SD 2-14) days. Only 11.8% (n=4) required a prolonged hospital stay of > 7 days due to maternal complications. Ninety-four out of 102 triplets were born alive, with a mean birth weight of 1,597.3 grams ± (SD 367.74 g). The various foetal/neonatal complications were noted, with the commonest being prematurity in 85.3% (n=29). The majority of triplet neonates with complications had a mean duration of NICU stay less than 1 week, 70.8% (n=17). Conclusion: While triplet pregnancies remain rare, they are associated with a significant materno-foetal risk which must be anticipated by obstetricians. Thus, early diagnosis, adequate antenatal care, counselling, and perinatal care and support can help to ensure optimal outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Medicine Law & Public HealthSame topicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyFrench-language works237,207