Hierarchical selection of genetic and gene by environment interaction effects in high-dimensional mixed models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interactions between genes and environmental factors may play a key role in the etiology of many common disorders. Several regularized generalized linear models have been proposed for hierarchical selection of gene by environment interaction effects, where a gene-environment interaction effect is selected only if the corresponding genetic main effect is also selected in the model. However, none of these methods allow to include random effects to account for population structure, subject relatedness and shared environmental exposure. In this article, we develop a unified approach based on regularized penalized quasi-likelihood estimation to perform hierarchical selection of gene-environment interaction effects in sparse regularized mixed models. We compare the selection and prediction accuracy of our proposed model with existing methods through simulations under the presence of population structure and shared environmental exposure. We show that for all simulation scenarios, including and additional random effect to account for the shared environmental exposure reduces the false positive rate and false discovery rate of our proposed method for selection of both gene-environment interaction and main effects. Using the [Formula: see text] score as a balanced measure of the false discovery rate and true positive rate, we further show that in the hierarchical simulation scenarios, our method outperforms other methods for retrieving important gene-environment interaction effects. Finally, we apply our method to a real data application using the Orofacial Pain: Prospective Evaluation and Risk Assessment (OPPERA) study, and found that our method retrieves previously reported significant loci.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".