Empowering Narratives: A Feminist Critique of Physicality, Identity, and Representation in the Hindi Film Mary Kom
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper, Empowering Narratives: A Feminist Critique of Physicality, Identity, and Representation in the Hindi Film Mary Kom, examines the biographical drama through a feminist lens, emphasizing its portrayal of gender, regional identity, and physicality.The film highlights Mary Kom's journey as a boxer from Manipur, exploring her defiance of societal norms and regional stereotypes.By integrating perspectives from Physical Education and English Literature, this study investigates themes such as women's physical strength, the struggles of motherhood, and North Eastern identity within a patriarchal and culturally homogenized context.Using feminist theories like intersectionality and embodiment, the analysis critiques the film's depiction of female empowerment, maternal sacrifice, and commodification of identity in Bollywood.While Mary Kom challenges gender norms, it also reveals the systemic barriers female athletes face.This interdisciplinary critique contributes to discourses on representation in Indian cinema, advocating for authentic, inclusive narratives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.059 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".