MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pressure–velocity coupling in transpiration cooling

2024· article· en· W4405267433 on OpenAlexafffund
Sophie Hillcoat, Jean-Pierre Hickey

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsTranspirationMechanicsMaterials scienceCoupling (piping)ThermodynamicsEnvironmental sciencePhysicsComposite materialChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transpiration cooling is an active thermal protection system of increasing interest in aerospace applications wherein a coolant is effused through a porous wall into a hot external flow. The present work focuses on the interaction between the high-temperature turbulent boundary layer and the pressure-driven coolant flow through the porous wall. A new coupling method was developed to investigate this interaction and is presented with an analysis of the results from the coupled simulations. Coupling functions relating the coolant injection velocity to the wall pressure were obtained from pore-network simulations. These were then coupled to direct numerical simulations of a turbulent boundary layer over a massively-cooled flat plate. Two different types of coupling function were used: algebraic expressions, which do not account for flow interactions between neighbouring pores, and shallow convolutional neural networks (CNN), which incorporate spatial correlations. All coupled cases demonstrated a significant variation in cooling effectiveness as a result of the variation in blowing due to the mean streamwise pressure gradient associated with the onset of coolant injection. This trend was mitigated in the CNN-coupled cases due to the incorporation of lateral flow between neighbouring pores. The distribution of turbulent kinetic energy in the coupled cases was also modified by the coupling due to the competing effects of near-wall turbulence attenuation and increased shear due to increasing blowing ratio. Finally, the coupling was shown to impact the power spectral density of the pressure fluctuations at the wall within the transpiration region, attenuating the largest scales of the turbulence whilst leaving the smaller scales relatively unaffected. These results demonstrate the importance of incorporating the pressure–velocity coupling in transpiration cooling models not only when considering transpiration cooling parameters but also when looking at the general flow structures within the boundary layer. • DNS of transpiration cooling with pressure–coupled coolant injection velocity were run. • A pressure–velocity coupling algorithm was developed for the DNS using a CNN. • Coupling effects were shown to be attenuated by lateral flow in the porous medium. • Variations in the different contributors to cooling effectiveness are discussed. • The coupling attenuates the boundary layer TKE and large scale pressure fluctuations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Heat and Mass TransferSame topicAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics ResearchFrench-language works237,207