MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405270051 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2024.3512197

Dual-Stream CNN-LSTM Architecture for Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation From PPG and ECG Signals: A PulseDB Study

2024· article· en· W4405270051 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mohamad Forouzanfar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhotoplethysmogramComputer scienceBlood streamDual (grammatical number)Blood pressureSpeech recognitionArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)TelecommunicationsMedicineInternal medicineWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate and noninvasive blood pressure (BP) monitoring is essential for managing cardiovascular health, yet traditional cuff-based methods are uncomfortable and unsuitable for continuous use. Existing cuffless BP estimation techniques face limitations such as limited feature extraction capabilities, which can result in lower performance, and validation on nonstandard or small datasets, which raises concerns about generalizability. To address these challenges, we propose a novel convolutional neural network (CNN)-long short-term memory (LSTM) architecture that independently processes photoplethysmogram (PPG) and electrocardiogram (ECG) signals through separate CNN layers, enhancing morphological feature extraction. These layers are followed by a multilayer Bi-LSTM network that captures long-term temporal dependencies, improving BP prediction accuracy. Unlike prior studies, we validate our method on the PulseDB dataset, the largest publicly available dataset for BP estimation, comprising cleaned PPG, ECG, and arterial BP (ABP) waveforms from the MIMIC-III and VitalDB databases. Evaluated on data from 3027 individuals using fivefold cross-validation, our model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 5.16 mmHg for systolic BP (SBP) and 3.24 mmHg for diastolic BP (DBP), with consistent performance across various age groups and genders. These results surpassed American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) standards and achieved an “A” grade by British Hypertension Society (BHS) standards, demonstrating the potential of this approach to improve patient comfort and care in diverse clinical and home environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207