MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405273037 · doi:10.1093/brain/awae399

Optimizing treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in cerebral small vessel disease using genetics

2024· article· en· W4405273037 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Fatemeh Koohi, Eric L. Harshfield, Dipender Gill, Wenjing Ge, Stephen Burgess, Hugh S. Markus

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research CentreMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthOffice of Research and DevelopmentDementias Platform UKCambridge University HospitalsUniversity of CambridgeDepartment of Health and Social CareAlzheimer SocietyNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchWellcome TrustAlzheimer's SocietyAlzheimer’s SocietyBritish Heart Foundation
KeywordsMendelian randomizationMedicineBlood pressureInternal medicineGenetic predispositionStroke (engine)HyperintensityLacunar strokeCardiologyDiseaseMagnetic resonance imagingBiologyGeneticsGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) causes lacunar stroke (LS) and intracerebral haemorrhage and is the most common pathology underlying vascular dementia. However, there are few trials examining whether treatment of conventional cardiovascular risk factors reduces stroke risk in cSVD, as opposed to stroke as a whole. We used Mendelian randomization techniques to investigate which risk factors are causally related to cSVD and to evaluate whether specific drugs might be beneficial in cSVD prevention. We identified genetic proxies for blood pressure traits, lipids, glycaemic markers, anthropometry measures, smoking, alcohol consumption and physical activity from large-scale genome-wide association studies of European ancestry. We also selected genetic variants as proxies for drug target perturbation in hypertension, dyslipidaemia, hyperglycaemia and obesity. Mendelian randomization was performed to assess their associations with LS from the GIGASTROKE Consortium (n = 6811) and in a sensitivity analysis in a cohort of patients with MRI-confirmed LS (n = 3306). We also investigated associations with three neuroimaging features of cSVD, namely, white matter hyperintensities (n = 55 291), fractional anisotropy (n = 36 460) and mean diffusivity (n = 36 012). Genetic predisposition to higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure was associated with LS and cSVD imaging markers. Genetically predicted liability to diabetes, obesity, smoking, higher triglyceride levels and the ratio of triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein also showed detrimental associations with LS risk, whereas genetic predisposition to higher high-density lipoprotein concentrations and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity showed protective associations. Genetically proxied blood pressure lowering through calcium channel blockers was associated with cSVD imaging markers, whereas genetically proxied high-density lipoprotein raising through cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors, triglyceride lowering through lipoprotein lipase and weight lowering through gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptor were associated with lower risk of LS. Our findings highlight the importance of some conventional cardiovascular risk factors, including blood pressure and body mass index, in cSVD, but not others, e.g. low-density lipoprotein. The findings also demonstrate the potential beneficial effects of calcium channel blockers on cSVD imaging markers and cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors, lipoprotein lipase enhancement and gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptor obesity-targeted drugs on LS. They provide useful information for initiating future clinical trials examining secondary prevention strategies in cSVD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207