MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405274463 · doi:10.5435/jaaos-d-24-00063

Heterotopic Ossification After Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

2024· review· en· W4405274463 on OpenAlexaff
Fahad Nadeem, James R. Jones, Mathew Hargreaves, Eugene W. Brabston, Aaron Casp, Amit Momaya, Thomas Evely

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeterotopic Ossification and Related Conditions
Canadian institutionsObject Research Systems (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeterotopic ossificationArthroplastyComplicationOssificationSurgeryIncidence (geometry)Soft tissueSystematic reviewTotal hip arthroplastyHip arthroplastyMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Shoulder arthroplasty is increasing in incidence over time. One potential complication that is not well studied following shoulder arthroplasty is heterotopic ossification (HO), the abnormal growth of extraskeletal bone in soft tissue. HO has been described as a complication in total hip arthroplasty literature but less described in the setting of shoulder arthroplasty. The aim of this systematic review is to present available evidence regarding the incidence, risk factors, and potential management of HO after shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in June 2023 using Pubmed, Embase, and Ovid Medline databases to retrieve all relevant studies evaluating the occurrence of HO after shoulder arthroplasty. The search was done in duplicate, and a quality assessment of all studies was included. RESULTS: A total of 170 studies were retrieved, of which 6 were included, involving 1,028 patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty with 1,038 operated shoulders. HO developed postoperatively in 28% of the included shoulders and was symptomatic in 12% with most cases occurring in shoulders that developed osteoarthritis and cuff tear arthropathy. Men appear to have an increased risk of developing HO post shoulder arthroplasty. Fewer than 2% of HO shoulders went on to have revision surgery, and no notable differences were observed in the postoperative mean elevation and external rotation angles of non-HO and HO shoulders. In addition, no reported benefit of the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was found against the formation of HO after shoulder arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: HO occurs in 28% of shoulder arthroplasties in our review. Most of these were asymptomatic in the reviewed articles. Male patients and revision surgery with osteoarthritis and cuff tear arthroplasty seem to be at higher risk of developing HO post shoulder arthroplasty. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs seem to not prevent the development of HO after shoulder arthroplasty; yet, future studies are needed to verify this claim. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; Systematic Review.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSame topicHeterotopic Ossification and Related ConditionsFrench-language works237,207