MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

AI and Language

2024· book-chapter· en· W4405279502 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in human services and public health (AHSPH) book series · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEducational Research and Science Teaching
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinguisticsComputer scienceNatural language processingProgramming languagePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed communication within the health and wellness industry. This transformation has not only enhanced healthcare delivery but also empowered individuals with tools and resources that facilitate proactive, personalized wellness management. Through language-based AI applications like chatbots, voice assistants, and Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithms, healthcare providers can offer seamless patient experiences, enhance accessibility, and support decision-making. Additionally, these AI-driven communication tools help break language barriers, foster patient engagement, and encourage healthy lifestyle choices. This chapter delves into the mechanisms, applications, and implications of AI in reshaping communication in health and wellness, analyzing the ethical, practical, and social facets of this transformation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it