MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405281113 · doi:10.7202/1114900ar

Expérience subjective des femmes à l’égard de l’image corporelle et de l’alimentation en période postnatale

2024· article· fr· W4405281113 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Mélanie Garceau, Julie Achim, Marie-Zoé Jarry-El Harouni

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de psychologie · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’objectif de cette étude est de documenter l’expérience subjective des femmes à l’égard de leur poids, leur image corporelle et leur alimentation en période postnatale. Pour ce faire, dix femmes, ayant donné naissance à un premier enfant il y a six mois, ont pris part à un entretien semi-structuré. Les résultats, obtenus à la suite d’une analyse thématique, s’organisent autour de deux grands axes, soit l’expérience subjective du corps chez les femmes et l’adaptation des comportements alimentaires en période postnatale. Ceux-ci se déclinent en plusieurs thèmes et sous-thèmes. Cette étude propose des implications cliniques et des pistes de recherches futures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue québécoise de psychologieSame topicEating Disorders and BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207