MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405281412 · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2024.104555

Uncovering factors affecting consumers’ decisions for pre-owned electric vehicles

2024· article· en· W4405281412 on OpenAlexafffund
Sk. Md. Mashrur, Moataz Mohamed

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBusinessTransport engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the electric vehicle (EV) market rises, the relevance of the used EV market becomes more significant in the context of environmental sustainability and green transportation. Hence, the study conducts data-driven investigations to comprehensively understand users’ preferences for pre-owned EVs. Full-time employed, highly educated, higher-income individuals living in detached homes or townhouses and owning personal parking amenities are more likely to purchase pre-owned EVs. The study used a latent class choice model to analyse the impact of hidden psychological factors and vehicle characteristics on “Experienced EV Drivers” and “New EV Drivers”. The latter class prefers sedans and home charging facilities while opting for pre-owned EVs. However, those concerned about EV charging infrastructure and price and those having a positive attitude toward automated vehicles were reluctant to purchase a pre-owned EV. Overall, the study provides target population-specific actionable policy insights aiming to promote the adoption and sustainable usage of EVs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Part D Transport and EnvironmentSame topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207