MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405284509 · doi:10.3390/s24247920

A Rapidly Tunable Laser System for Measurements of NH2 at 597 nm Behind Reflected Shock Waves

2024· article· en· W4405284509 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sean Clees, Spencer C. Barnes, Taylor M. Rault, Christopher L. Strand, Ronald K. Hanson

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship ProgramNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTotalNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMaterials scienceLaserOpticsWavelengthLithium niobateOptoelectronicsDiodeSpectroscopySecond-harmonic generationPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed feedback lasers, which feature rapid wavelength tunability, are not presently available in the yellow and orange spectral regions, impeding spectroscopic studies of short-lived species that absorb light in this range. To meet this need, a rapidly tunable laser system was constructed, characterized, and demonstrated for measurements of the NH2 radical at 597.4 nm. The system consisted of three main parts: (1) a distributed feedback diode laser operating at 1194.8 nm, (2) a fiber-coupled optical amplifier, and (3) a periodically poled lithium niobate (PPLN) waveguide for second-harmonic generation. A phase-matching optical frequency bandwidth of 118 GHz and a second-harmonic generation efficiency of 109%/W were determined for the PPLN waveguide, and the intensity and wavelength stability of the system were measured. The rapid-tuning capabilities of the laser system were characterized to explore its potential for use in scanned-direct absorption and wavelength modulation spectroscopy experiments. The feasibility of scanned-direct absorption up to a scan rate of 900 kHz and wavelength modulation spectroscopy at modulation frequencies up to 800 kHz were demonstrated. Finally, the system was deployed in a series of shock tube experiments in which the concentration of NH2 radicals was measured during the decomposition of NH3 behind reflected shock waves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207