MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405302830 · doi:10.7202/1114962ar

Impératifs éthiques : défense de la vaccination obligatoire en CHSLD

2024· article· fr· W4405302830 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Elias Chaccour

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Bioethics · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVaccinationMedicineVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article examine la décision du gouvernement du Québec de rendre obligatoire la vaccination aux travailleurs des centres d’hébergement et de soins de longue durée en réponse à la pandémie de COVID-19. Il explore les arguments en faveur de cette mesure, tels que la protection des résidents vulnérables et la préservation des services de santé, tout en examinant les préoccupations liées à une possible pénurie de main-d’oeuvre, les droits individuels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.023
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BioethicsSame topicVaccine Coverage and HesitancyFrench-language works237,207