MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405303327 · doi:10.1109/icjece.2024.3472056

Space and Position Management of Wideband Conformal Vivaldi Antenna Array With Sidelobe Reduction

2024· article· en· W4405303327 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anil Kumar Yerrola, Maifuz Ali, Ravi Kumar Arya, Ashwani Kumar, Lakhindar Murmu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVivaldi antennaPosition (finance)PhysicsAntenna (radio)Reduction (mathematics)Space (punctuation)OpticsWidebandComputer scienceTelecommunicationsRadiation patternGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work systematically studies conformal Vivaldi antenna (VA) arrays in a spherical volume. A VA with gain varying from 5 to 9 dBi and$S_{11} \leq -10$dB from 4.3 to 9.8 GHz is considered. A$1 \times 7$VAs are placed on a correctional area of the cylinder to scan from$\theta = 0^{\circ}$to 45° at$\phi = 90^{\circ}$. The results show that the sidelobe level (SLL) has a higher amplitude, almost equivalent to the main lobe. To reduce the SLL, the phase center to phase center distance of antenna elements is reduced by bringing the radius correctional area of the cylinder leading to the development of a modified VA (MVA) without disturbing the$S_{11}$parameters of the VA. To verify, the MVA as a radiating element a$1 \times 7$circular MVA array is developed with the same scanning capability, the results show a high reduction of SLL. Finally, a 49-element MVA array arranged in a spherical volume is developed to obtain 3-D-beam scanning. The antenna elements are designed to be conformal to the periphery of a sphere to achieve a 360° beam scanning in the azimuthal plane and ±45° in the elevation angle. The 3-D array has a realized gain of 18.57 dBi at$\theta = 0^{\circ}$and an approximately 10 dB difference in the magnitude of the major lobe and side lobe levels at all the scan angles. The validation is carried out using ANSYS HFSS full wave solver and achieved a good agreement with the theoretical considerations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.155
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207