MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405303612 · doi:10.1109/tase.2024.3514143

GPD: Learning Geometric Primitive Deformation for Unseen Object Pose Estimation

2024· article· en· W4405303612 on OpenAlexaff
Qiwei Meng, Jason Gu, Yun-Hui Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobot Manipulation and Learning
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersThe Research Council
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionPoseDeformation (meteorology)Computer scienceObject (grammar)Pattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Witnessing the rapid progress and development in instance-level object pose estimation, increasing attention has shifted to the more challenging problem for unseen objects, which is in great demand for various robotic applications. In this paper, we propose the GPD, a novel framework for unseen object pose estimation, including both category-level and cross-category objects. The key innovation of the GPD model is the effective utilization of geometric primitives in target reconstruction and pose estimation, as it can generalize the learned primitive deformation across intra-class and inter-class instances. Additionally, we also design an advanced scheme for representative object feature extraction, including attention-aware excitation, multi-scale fusion, and semantic feature encoding. Extensive evaluations validate the effectiveness of individual innovation modules and the overall superior performance of the GPD. It not only achieves the SOTA results on category-level benchmarks CAMERA25 and REAL275, but also demonstrates impressive generalization ability across novel objects on the GraspNet-1Billion dataset. Furthermore, we deploy the trained GPD model for vision-guided robotic grasping experiments in simulation and real-world settings, again exhibiting its outstanding robustness and practicability in robotic manipulations. Note to Practitioners—This paper is motivated by the problem of unseen object pose estimation and robotic manipulation in unstructured environments. For intelligent robots expected to interact with their surroundings, rather than just passively perceiving them like surveillance cameras, 6Dof pose estimation is a critical capability. However, existing approaches generally face two key challenges. On the one hand, robots are likely to encounter unseen objects in real-world applications. Without the availability of prior models or specific training data for these unseen objects, instance-level and category-level methods may become ineffective or even fail to work. On the other hand, the error tolerance of precise tabletop robotic manipulation is very tight, and the varying lighting conditions and background noise impose higher robustness requirements on pose estimation algorithms. To address these difficulties, we propose a novel network that learns geometric primitive deformation for pose estimation. This model is less dependent on object prior information, thereby enhancing the generalization ability. Additionally, by incorporating cross-modal excitation and multi-scale fusion during feature extraction, our model can capture representative appearance and geometric information of objects for accurate pose estimation. Extensive experimental results on benchmark datasets quantitatively validate the superior performance of our approach. We also demonstrate its effectiveness in robotic applications through unseen object grasping experiments on Kinova and Franka Emika robot platforms. In the future, we plan to explore primitive combination schemes for compound object representation, enabling pose estimation for more complex-shaped objects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and EngineeringSame topicRobot Manipulation and LearningFrench-language works237,207