MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Compound Dimension Wavelet Network and Its Application in Bearings Fault Diagnosis Under Varying Speeds

2024· article· en· W4405306242 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Q. Lin, Tianyang Wang, Zhaoye Qin, Fulei Chu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDimension (graph theory)WaveletFault (geology)Computer scienceBearing (navigation)Artificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Wavelet transformMathematicsGeologyPure mathematicsSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neural networks have been widely applied in the field of bearing fault diagnosis. However, many existing studies focus on bearings with constant rotational speeds, and there is a lack of research on neural networks for diagnosing faults in bearings with varying speeds. In practice, bearings are always working under varying rotational speeds. This paper proposes a one-dimensional and two-dimensional hybrid neural network combined with wavelet transform for bearings fault diagnosis under variable speeds. Instead of using one-dimensional convolutional kernels, wavelets are employed as generating a two-dimensional feature map that can represent the relationship between signal time and frequency, and the two-dimensional convolutional layer extracts features from the output of the one-dimensional convolutional layer, which is the time-frequency representation obtained through wavelet transformation of the signal. The feasibility of the proposed method is validated on a publicly available dataset from the University of Ottawa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGear and Bearing Dynamics AnalysisFrench-language works237,207