MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405308136 · doi:10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105981

Performance-based wind design of tall mass timber buildings with coupled post-tensioned cross-laminated timber shear walls

2024· article· en· W4405308136 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTree Root and Stability Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCross laminated timberStructural engineeringShear (geology)Shear wallEngineeringGeologyMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Engineered timber panels, such as cross-laminated timber (CLT), have enabled tall mass timber buildings to reach heights equivalent to mid-rise concrete and steel buildings. Tall mass timber buildings are lighter and more flexible than their concrete and steel equivalents, which makes their design wind-critical. The current prescriptive code-based design of main wind force resisting systems (MWFRSs) only considers buildings’ linear-elastic capacity, resulting in costly designs requiring commercially unavailable timber cross sections. This prevents engineers from fully utilizing timber as MWFRS and limits the height that mass timber buildings can reach. In performance-based wind design (PBWD), nonlinear-inelastic deformation in specially designed and detailed parts of MWFRSs enables an optimal design. However, controlling damage accumulation in structures can be challenging due to the substantial mean component of wind loads in the along-wind direction. To this end, self-centering systems such as coupled post-tensioned CLT (PT-CLT) walls can offer a solution. However, despite extensive analytical and experimental studies on the use of PT-CLT walls as seismic force-resisting systems, their use as MWFRSs has not been explored. Therefore, this paper proposes the use of PT-CLT walls as MWFRSs in tall mass timber buildings and develops a new PBWD approach for their design. To demonstrate the applicability of the PBWD approach, 8- and 16-story prototype mass timber buildings hypothetically located in Toronto, Canada, were designed using PBWD and load information from wind tunnel tests. For performance assessment, three-dimensional multi-spring numerical models were developed in OpenSeesPy and validated with full-scale quasi-static cyclic and shaking table experimental tests. Performance assessments using nonlinear response history analysis (NLRHA) under simultaneous along-, across-, and torsional-wind loads for 36 wind directions were carried out. The results indicate that the proposed PBWD framework is practical and effective for designing PT-CLT shear walls as MWFRSs in tall mass timber buildings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it