A Unified Flexible Large Polysomnography Model for Sleep Staging and Brain Disorder Diagnosis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sleep disorders affect billions worldwide, yet clinical polysomnography (PSG) analysis remains hindered by labor-intensive manual scoring and limited generalizability of automated sleep staging tools across heterogeneous protocols. We present LPSGM, a large-scale PSG model designed to address two critical challenges in sleep medicine: cross-center generalization and adaptable diagnosis of neuropsychiatric disorders. Trained on 220,500 hours of multi-center PSG data (24,000 full-night recordings from 16 public datasets), LPSGM integrates domain-adaptive pre-training, flexible channel configurations, and a unified architecture to mitigate variability in equipment, montages, and populations during sleep staging while enabling downstream fine-tuning for mental disorder detection. In prospective validation, LPSGM achieves expert-level consensus in sleep staging (κ = 0.845 ± 0.066 vs. inter-expert κ = 0.850 ± 0.102) and matches the performance of fully supervised models on two independent private cohorts. When fine-tuned, it attains 88.01% accuracy in narcolepsy detection and 100% accuracy in identifying major depressive disorder (MDD), highlighting shared physiological biomarkers between sleep architecture and neuropsychiatric symptoms. By bridging automated sleep staging with real-world clinical deployment, LPSGM establishes a scalable, data-efficient framework for integrated sleep and mental health diagnostics. The code and pre-trained model are publicly available at https://github.com/Deng-GuiFeng/LPSGM to advance reproducibility and translational research in sleep medicine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it