MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405312808 · doi:10.1016/j.est.2024.114912

Insights into the structure-property relationships of activated carbon derived from phenolic resin for electrochemical storage of green hydrogen using proton battery

2024· article· en· W4405312808 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ruchika Ojha, Subashani Maniam, Seyed Mohammad Rezaei Niya, Annelisa S. Rigoni, Kevin Tran, Akshat Tanksale, Michelle J. S. Spencer, John T. Andrews

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Energy Storage · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHydrogen Storage and Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Renewable Energy AgencyRMIT UniversityNational Computational InfrastructureOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
KeywordsHydrogen storageBattery (electricity)ElectrochemistryCarbon fibersProtonActivated carbonHydrogenChemistryMaterials scienceChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryComposite materialElectrodeComposite numberEngineeringPhysicsPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrochemical hydrogen storage in porous activated carbons is a rapidly advancing technology, yet the composition and role of oxygen-containing surface functionalities in hydrogen storage remain underexplored. This study provides a detailed investigation of the surface and bulk properties of porous activated carbon derived from phenolic resin (aC PR) using a comprehensive multi-technique approach, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), temperature programmed desorption (TPD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and Raman spectroscopy . The aC PR exhibits an exceptional BET surface area of approximately 4400 m 2 /g, with a well-balanced distribution of mesopores , micropores , and ultra-micropores. Quantitative analyses reveal that aC PR is composed of 95.45 % carbon and 4.55 % oxygen, with oxygen functionalities distributed as carboxylic acid (~8 %), anhydride (~28 %), phenol (~17 %), carbonyl and quinones (~21 %), and lactones (~23 %). Post-TPD treatment, the oxygen content reduces to 2.25 %, with minimal impact on the material's hydrogen storage capacity, which remains at ~0.60 ± 0.05 wt% H. H-storage was measured using Proton Battery . In the proton battery, protons are generated by water splitting towards the oxygen side and are stored towards the C side in the negatively charged ac PR electrode. Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations demonstrate that both acidic and basic oxygen-containing groups have similar proton affinities , suggesting that the type of oxygen functional group plays a minimal role in hydrogen storage capacity. This work underscores the critical role of oxygen functionalities in hydrogen storage and offers new insights into the design and optimization of next-generation carbon materials for scalable hydrogen storage technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Energy StorageSame topicHydrogen Storage and MaterialsFrench-language works237,207