Secondary irradiation for radiation damage studies and isotope harvesting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ISAC-TRIUMF operates targets under proton irradiation in the high-power regime of 50 kW ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mrow> <a:mn>100</a:mn> <a:mtext> </a:mtext> <a:mtext> </a:mtext> <a:mi mathvariant="normal">μ</a:mi> <a:mi mathvariant="normal">A</a:mi> </a:mrow> </a:math> , 500 MeV) to produce radioactive isotope beams using the isotope separation on-line technique. The targets irradiated at ISAC have a total stopping power significantly lower than 500 MeV resulting in a residual high-power proton beam downstream of the target. The coupling of a supplementary target in a downstream position allows for additional scientific output. Irradiation conditions have been analyzed with the code and relevant achievable research within operational limitations explored. Prominently, the study of material degradation under high radiation fields is of increasing interest due to the steady demand for high-performance materials for new-generation nuclear applications and beam-intercepting components at high-power particle accelerator facilities. Successive irradiations at ISAC yield relevant radiation damage of bulk material samples which can then be characterized using already existing facilities at TRIUMF and partner facilities. Additionally, a variety of isotopes produced by transmutation with research applicability can be harvested from these irradiations. With the purpose of unlocking this complementary research at ISAC-TRIUMF, a secondary target, attached to the primary ISAC target system, has been designed and commissioned. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".