MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405314587 · doi:10.5354/2735-6620.2024.74690

El irracionalismo del capitalismo decadente

2024· article· es· W4405314587 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Natália Perdomo dos Santos

Bibliographic record

VenuePropuestas Críticas en Trabajo Social - Critical Proposals in Social Work · 2024
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artículo propone analizar, a partir de la tradición inaugurada por la obra marxiana, los fundamentos constitutivos del neoliberalismo que lo configuran como una estrategia de reproducción del capitalismo tardío. Emergente en el proceso de madurez de la sociedad burguesa, el neoliberalismo reformula la acción del Estado para adaptarlo a las necesidades impuestas por las nuevas formas de gestión de la acumulación, que frente a la hegemonía del capital portador de intereses solo puede garantizar la valorización del valor con un poder destructivo incontrolable. Este movimiento revela la barbarie que constituye la sociedad burguesa y que es especialmente manifiesta en los países dependientes. Resulta de esta etapa la reconfiguración de las relaciones y de los seres sociales en su totalidad, cuyo nuevo modo de ser muestra el irracionalismo del capitalismo decadente. Esta concepción fundamenta la crítica al pensamiento mistificador de Dardot y Laval, expuesto en el libro 'La Nueva Razón del Mundo'. Sus tesis, que han ganado eco en el trabajo social brasilero, se proponen críticas al neoliberalismo, pero al salvaguardar la lógica estructural de la sociedad que lo hace emerger, se limitan a la epiderme del problema, representando las típicas deformaciones ideológicas de la etapa actual.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.006
Science and technology studies0.0060.010
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePropuestas Críticas en Trabajo Social - Critical Proposals in Social WorkSame topicHistorical Studies in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207