MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mortality Among Severely Injured Adolescents Admitted to Pediatric vs Adult Trauma Centers

2024· article· en· W4405317256 on OpenAlexaffabout
Fiona Muttalib, Bourke W. Tillmann, Genevieve Ernst, Srinivas Murthy, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Bettina Hansen, Neill K. J. Adhikari

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Network Open · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentrePublic Health OntarioUniversity of British ColumbiaHospital for Sick ChildrenToronto General HospitalSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoBC Children's HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePediatric traumaPediatricsEmergency medicineTrauma centerInjury preventionPoison controlRetrospective cohort studySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Care in a pediatric (vs adult) trauma center improves outcomes for injured children aged 0 to 12 years, but whether pediatric care benefits injured adolescents is unclear. Objective: To evaluate the association of pediatric vs adult trauma center care with mortality among severely injured adolescents. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2020, among adolescents aged 12 to 16 years who were admitted to level I or level II adult trauma centers or a level I pediatric trauma center in British Columbia, Canada. Analysis was conducted between January and September 2024. Exposure: Admission to a level I pediatric trauma center or level I or level II adult trauma center. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was hospital mortality for the index trauma incident. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to estimate the association of admission to a pediatric trauma center with mortality. Results: A total of 416 patients aged 12 to 16 years (median [IQR] age, 15 [13-16] years; 308 male [74.0%]) were admitted to a level I or level II trauma center with severe injury (201 [48.6%] at a pediatric trauma center; 83 [20.0%] at a level I adult trauma center; and 132 [31.7%] at a level II adult trauma center). Patients admitted to the pediatric trauma center (vs level I or level II adult centers) had lower median (IQR) age (14 [13-15] years vs 15 [14-16] years), higher median (IQR) Injury Severity Score (16 [9-21] vs 13 [9-18]) and fewer penetrating injuries (10 injuries [5.0%] vs 28 injuries [13.0%]). Hospital mortality was 7.0% (14 of 201 patients) among patients admitted to the pediatric center vs 4.2% (9 of 215 patients) among those admitted to an adult trauma center. There was no statistically significant difference in hospital mortality between patients admitted to pediatric vs adult trauma centers (adjusted odds ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 0.88-7.69; P = .08). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of severely injured adolescents, pediatric trauma center admission was not associated with improved hospital mortality. These findings suggest that severely injured adolescents aged 12 to 16 years may be safely treated at either adult or pediatric trauma centers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA Network OpenSame topicTrauma and Emergency Care StudiesFrench-language works237,207