Identités diasporiques mises en cause chez des femmes immigrées d’origine portugaise : le cas de Joaquina Pires
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette contribution propose une analyse de deux ouvrages littéraires collectifs autour d’histoires de jeunes femmes et de grands-mères d’origine portugaise immigrées qui sont arrivées au Canada ou ailleurs dans des contextes similaires. Avós : raízes e nós (2020), de Aida Baptista, Ilda Januário et Manuela Marujo, offre un véritable parcours au sein de représentations identitaires de personnes issues de la migration portugaise en quête d’identité, face à leurs grands-parents souvent restés au pays. Menina e moça me levaram (2021), de Aida Baptista, au contraire, veut mettre en avant la position de femme immigrante et de réussite, en soulignant les obstacles existentiels rencontrés tout au long du processus d’intégration linguistique et sociale, et en proposant la richesse et la diversité de certains chemins de vie. Nous soulignons ici l’histoire de Joaquina Pires et son « voyage » personnel de migrante, parcours exemplaire qui s’inscrit au sein de la communauté portugaise de Montréal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".