MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405320062 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.110.064608

Cross sections for the formation of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mi>Rb</mml:mi> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>84</mml:mn> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mo> </mml:mo> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mi>Rb</mml:mi> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mn>83</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> , and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mi>Rb</mml:mi> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>82</mml:mn> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mi>Sr</mml:mi> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mn>86</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> reactions up to deuteron energies of 49 MeV: Competition between <i>α</i> -particle and multinucleon emission processes

2024· article· lv· W4405320062 on OpenAlexaff
M.S. Uddin, S. Sudár, M. S. Basunia, Ingo Spahn, Andrew S. Voyles, Α. Hermanne, L. A. Bernstein, Bernd Neumaier, S.M. Qaim

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2024
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cross sections of $^{86}\mathrm{Sr}(d,x)$ reactions leading to the products $^{84m,g}\mathrm{Rb}, ^{83}\mathrm{Rb}$, and $^{82m}\mathrm{Rb}$ were measured by the stacked-sample activation technique up to deuteron energies of 49 MeV. Nuclear model calculations were performed using the codes talys and empire, which combine the statistical, precompound, and direct interaction components. In all cases, the empire results were much higher than the talys calculation. Fairly good agreement was obtained between measured data and the talys calculation after some optimization of the input model parameters. Insight into competition between \ensuremath{\alpha}-particle and multinucleon emission in the $^{88}\mathrm{Y}$ compound-nucleus system was also gained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.326
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3260.201

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207