Modeling electrolytic transport for systems with concentration gradients, Ohmic resistance and electrochemical reactions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes a two-dimensional multi-component electrolytic transport model that calculates the electric field by applying electroneutrality as an upper bound. This approach avoids directly enforcing electroneutrality in mass transport calculations or using Poisson’s equation. The two coupled equations of this model were numerically solved for cases with no convection. The transport equation was solved using a modified Control Volume method and a Peclet number. The electric field equation was discretized using the finite difference method and solved using the Alternating Direction Implicit method. The model’s results were compared with free-diffusion liquid junction data. Comparisons were also made with one-dimensional transport models. The model was then used to simulate two-dimensional scenarios without prescribed current distributions. The simulations agreed with the comparison data. Hence, the model shows promise in its ability to simulate two-dimensional multi-component electrolytic transport with concentration gradients, Ohmic resistance, and electrochemical reactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it