Éducation à l'environnement et dialogue philosophique : obstacles et recommandations pour l’intégration en milieu scolaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La pratique du dialogue philosophique (PDP) est une avenue pédagogique de choix en éducation relative à l'environnement (ERE). Certains obstacles ont cependant été documentés, tant pour l'intégration de la PDP en classe que pour celle de l'ERE. Quels sont les obstacles potentiels et les recommandations à prendre en compte dans le cadre d’un projet éducatif d’ERE qui ferait appel à la PDP ? Nous avons entrepris une recension narrative de la littérature permettant d’identifier les obstacles et les recommandations relatives à l’ERE et nous les avons mis en relation avec des obstacles et des recommandations identifiés en PDP. Nous avons pu repérer ainsi six catégories d'obstacles et quatre catégories de recommandations. Des pistes pour de futures recherches sont proposées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.052 | 0.057 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.026 | 0.028 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.017 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".