Book Review: <i>The Naval Government of Newfoundland in the French Wars 1793–1815</i> by John Morrow MorrowJohn, The Naval Government of Newfoundland in the French Wars 1793–1815. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2023. 242 pp., bibliography, index. ISBN 978-1-350-38317-3, £85(hbk).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
different strategies of language, worship and cultural identity in the face of segregation in Egypt, and the navigating of complex interactions and 'multicultural milieu' (147) that emerged between Phoenicians, Greeks and indigenous populations on the central islands.I highly recommend Phoenicians among Others as a work of important scholarship on a little-explored topic of the ancient Mediterranean, which may prove of significant interest to an academic audience.While the historical and material evidence selected understandably skews the focus of the discussion towards the areas of greatest representation and preservationnamely, Phoenician communities within specific regions of Greece -Demetriou's study nevertheless comprises a detailed, thoroughly researched and persuasive examination of the overall under-represented agency of Phoenician immigrants in the ancient Hellenistic and Roman periods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.078 | 0.035 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".