The Impact of the Digital Economy on the Upgrading of Resident Consumption
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the continuous advancement of technology, the digital economy is gradually integrating into people's lives. For the public, innovations in economic models mean that the quality of daily life is subtly changing, with the most direct external manifestation being consumption. This paper uses a literature review approach, based on the research conclusions of multiple studies, to explore in depth the impact of the digital economy on residential consumption upgrading from two perspectives: residents' consumption levels and consumption environments. The study shows that the popularity of the digital economy has led to the development of new consumption concepts and created a more advanced way of consumption. The study also found most industrial structures' digital transformation aligns with the needs of the middle and low-income groups in society, which can greatly promote consumption among these groups and improve their quality of life. Additionally, the concepts and technologies of the digital economy have created a more comfortable and reliable ecological environment for consumers, significantly promoting the iterative upgrading of residential consumption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it