MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405335319 · doi:10.2147/nss.s491893

Impaired Vigilance in Patients with Narcolepsy Type 1: A Psychomotor Vigilance Task Study

2024· article· en· W4405335319 on OpenAlex
Jiaqin Yu, Yuyan Zhou, Xiao Han, Zongshan Li, Feiyan Chen, Lisan Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNature and Science of Sleep · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersShaoxing UniversityZhejiang UniversitySir Run Run Shaw Hospital
KeywordsPsychomotor vigilance taskVigilance (psychology)Epworth Sleepiness ScaleMedicineNarcolepsyPsychomotor learningPittsburgh Sleep Quality IndexMontreal Cognitive AssessmentExcessive daytime sleepinessArousalAudiologyCognitionPolysomnographySleep disorderModafinilPsychiatryPsychologySleep deprivationApneaCognitive impairmentSleep quality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: The psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) is one of the main methods to measure sustained vigilance/attention in sleep research. Vigilance is the main factor affecting daytime function in patients with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1). We aimed to quantify the negative effects of sleep-wake disorders on vigilance and investigate potential neural mechanisms. Patients and Methods: We compared data from 42 patients and 31 healthy controls, including sociodemographics, nighttime sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI), sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale, ESS), cognitive abilities (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA), emotional control (Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11, BIS-11), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PHQ-9), and PVT performance. PVT outcomes analyzed included number of lapses, reaction time (RT), variability in RT, and the slowest and fastest 10% of RTs. All patients were diagnosed with NT1 based on The International Classification of Sleep Disorders-Third Edition. Results: Patients with NT1 had a significantly higher body mass index and longer duration of education than healthy controls. The patients also had a greater tendency for daytime sleepiness and poorer nighttime sleep quality, higher depression and impulsiveness scores, and more severe cognitive dysfunction. PVT performance was better in the healthy controls than in patients with NT1. We also noticed that emotional changes and the proportion of rapid eye movement sleep at night are related to PVT performance. Conclusion: More severe sleepiness and an increased emotional burden could underlie the arousal and vigilance deficits seen in patients with NT1. We speculate that impaired vigilance in patients with NT1 is associated with abnormal brain function caused by a resource allocation imbalance related to hypothalamic orexin neuron damage, sleep inertia may also have a slight impact on this. Future studies should delve into this topic more deeply.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it