MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405338233 · doi:10.5430/wjel.v15n2p240

Attitudes of Engineering Students towards English Courses at Jadara University in Jordan

2024· article· en· W4405338233 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Luqman Rababah

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of English Language · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSecond Language Learning and Teaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumRelevance (law)PerceptionDescriptive statisticsMathematics educationCommunication skillsEnglish languageInternational communicationField (mathematics)PsychologyComputer sciencePedagogyMedical educationPolitical scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

English is a crucial language for students to communicate effectively in various aspects of their lives, including study, work, and social interactions. In developing countries, English serves as a second language to overcome language barriers and facilitate international communication. Engineering students need to develop verbal and written communication skills for their profession. English's global spread is influenced by historical, social, cultural, and economic factors. It is now the primary international language. English plays a significant role in the development of communication technological advances, and engineering students have increased exposure to technological English. However, current college methodologies do not adequately address students' communicative needs during their English degree in Jordan.Objective: This study explored the attitudes of engineering students at Jadara University in Jordan towards English courses.Methods: A survey was conducted to gather quantitative data, and statistical analysis, both descriptive and inferential, was employed to interpret the findings.Results: The results revealed a general positive attitude towards the importance of English proficiency, although various factors such as course content, teaching methods, and perceived relevance to the engineering field influenced student perceptions.Conclusions: Recommendations for curriculum improvement and teaching strategies are provided based on the study's findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of English LanguageSame topicSecond Language Learning and TeachingFrench-language works237,207