Associations between prenatal exposure to PFAS and cardiometabolic health in preadolescents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: While a number of studies have examined the effects of prenatal exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) on childhood obesity, the results reported have been inconsistent and few studies have integrated biological markers. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between prenatal exposure to PFAS and cardiometabolic health parameters at age 12, taking pubertal stage into consideration. METHOD: This study included 394 mother-child pairs enrolled in the PELAGIE mother-child cohort (France). Nine PFAS were measured in umbilical cord blood, and the children attended a clinical examination at age 12. Anthropometry, blood metabolic markers, and blood pressure were measured and used to build an internal cardiometabolic score. Linear regression and Quantile G-computation models were used to evaluate individual and mixture PFAS effects, adjusting for confounders and stratifying by sex and pubertal stage. RESULTS: No statistically significant association was observed between prenatal exposure to PFAS and cardiometabolic score at age 12. In post-menarche girls, perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS) and perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) were statistically significantly associated with a decrease in a number of adiposity parameters (e.g., Body mass index z-score: beta [95%CI] = -0.37 [-0.67; -0.07]), as well as a decrease in low-density lipoproteins (LDL) and leptin levels. Similar results were observed with PFAS mixture, with statistically significantly decreased tricipital skinfolds (beta [95%CI] = -1.30 [(-2.54;-0.06)]). Isolated associations, including higher systolic blood pressure, changes in cholesterol levels, and lower adiponectin levels were observed in specific subgroups. CONCLUSION: There is no clear evidence of an association between prenatal exposure to PFAS and the cardiometabolic health at earlier stage of pubertal development. However, inverse associations between PFAS and anthropometric measures have been observed in post-menarche girls. While the literature on this topic is scarce in pre-adolescents, these results suggest the importance of considering sex and pubertal stage in these associations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".