MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405339209 · doi:10.1002/cjce.25577

Fault estimation for multi‐rate descriptor systems using bi‐directional long short‐term memory neural network

2024· article· en· W4405339209 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dhrumil Gandhi, Meka Srinivasarao

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtended Kalman filterComputer scienceArtificial neural networkFault (geology)Kalman filterControl theory (sociology)Feed forwardAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceControl engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fault estimation in multi‐rate descriptor systems, which involve both differential and algebraic states, is particularly challenging due to the complexity introduced by multi‐rate measurements. This paper proposes a novel fault estimation approach that combines a differential‐algebraic equation based extended Kalman filter (DAE‐EKF) with a bi‐directional long short‐term memory (bi‐LSTM) neural network. The DAE‐EKF is used to generate multi‐rate residuals, which serve as inputs to neural networks to estimate faults. bi‐LSTM networks improve upon LSTMs by processing data in both forward and backward directions, using past and future information. This bidirectional approach enhances temporal dependency capture, making bi‐LSTMs ideal for accurate fault estimation. The efficacy of the proposed method is demonstrated using simulation studies on a two‐phase reactor‐condenser system with recycle and a reactive distillation system. The proposed approach has shown superior fault estimation capability for multi‐rate descriptor systems compared to DAE‐EKF with conventional feedforward neural networks and DAE‐EKF with LSTM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207