MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405354090 · doi:10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100837

Effect of vasopressin on brain and cardiac tissue during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated post-transitional piglets

2024· article· en· W4405354090 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueResuscitation Plus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsRoyal Alexandra HospitalUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCardiopulmonary resuscitationMedicineVasopressinAnesthesiaResuscitationNeonatal resuscitationCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Epinephrine is currently the only recommended cardio-resuscitative medication for use in neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), as per consensus of science and treatment recommendations. An alternative medication, vasopressin, may be beneficial, however there is limited data regarding its effect on cardiac and brain tissue following recovery from neonatal CPR. Aim: To compare the effects of vasopressin and epinephrine during resuscitation of asphyxiated post-transitional piglets on cardiac and brain tissue injury. Methods: Newborn piglets (n = 10/group) were anesthetized, tracheotomized and intubated, instrumented, and exposed to hypoxia-asphyxia and cardiac arrest. Piglets were randomly allocated to receive intravenous vasopressin (Vaso, 0.4 U/kg) or epinephrine (Epi, 0.02 mg/kg) during CPR until return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Left ventricle cardiac tissue, and frontoparietal cerebral cortex and thalamus samples from brain tissue were collected from piglets that survived four hours after ROSC. The concentrations of the pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, cardiac troponin-1, lactate, and levels of oxidized and total glutathione were quantified in tissue homogenates. Main Results: The median time (IQR) to ROSC was 127 (98-162)sec with Vaso and 197 (117-480)sec with Epi (p = 0.07). ROSC rate was 10/10 (100 %) with Vaso and 7/10 (70 %) with Epi (p = 0.21); survival to four hours after ROSC was 10/10 (100 %) with Vaso and 5/7 (71 %) with Epi (p = 0.15). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were significantly different between groups (p = 0.011). Cardiac tissue IL-8 concentration was significantly lower with Vaso than Epi (16.9 (2.94)pg/mg vs. 33.0 (6.75)pg/mg, p = 0.026). All other markers of cardiac and brain tissue injury were similar between Vaso and Epi groups. Conclusions: Vasopressin is effective in the resuscitation of asphyxiated newborn piglets and is associated with reduced inflammation of the myocardium compared to epinephrine, and there was no evidence of increased tissue injury in the frontoparietal cortex and thalamus regions of the brain. Vasopressin might be a viable alternative to epinephrine during neonatal CPR, but further studies are warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score0.853

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it