Effect of vasopressin on brain and cardiac tissue during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated post-transitional piglets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Epinephrine is currently the only recommended cardio-resuscitative medication for use in neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), as per consensus of science and treatment recommendations. An alternative medication, vasopressin, may be beneficial, however there is limited data regarding its effect on cardiac and brain tissue following recovery from neonatal CPR. Aim: To compare the effects of vasopressin and epinephrine during resuscitation of asphyxiated post-transitional piglets on cardiac and brain tissue injury. Methods: Newborn piglets (n = 10/group) were anesthetized, tracheotomized and intubated, instrumented, and exposed to hypoxia-asphyxia and cardiac arrest. Piglets were randomly allocated to receive intravenous vasopressin (Vaso, 0.4 U/kg) or epinephrine (Epi, 0.02 mg/kg) during CPR until return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Left ventricle cardiac tissue, and frontoparietal cerebral cortex and thalamus samples from brain tissue were collected from piglets that survived four hours after ROSC. The concentrations of the pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, cardiac troponin-1, lactate, and levels of oxidized and total glutathione were quantified in tissue homogenates. Main Results: The median time (IQR) to ROSC was 127 (98-162)sec with Vaso and 197 (117-480)sec with Epi (p = 0.07). ROSC rate was 10/10 (100 %) with Vaso and 7/10 (70 %) with Epi (p = 0.21); survival to four hours after ROSC was 10/10 (100 %) with Vaso and 5/7 (71 %) with Epi (p = 0.15). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were significantly different between groups (p = 0.011). Cardiac tissue IL-8 concentration was significantly lower with Vaso than Epi (16.9 (2.94)pg/mg vs. 33.0 (6.75)pg/mg, p = 0.026). All other markers of cardiac and brain tissue injury were similar between Vaso and Epi groups. Conclusions: Vasopressin is effective in the resuscitation of asphyxiated newborn piglets and is associated with reduced inflammation of the myocardium compared to epinephrine, and there was no evidence of increased tissue injury in the frontoparietal cortex and thalamus regions of the brain. Vasopressin might be a viable alternative to epinephrine during neonatal CPR, but further studies are warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".