MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405356786 · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2024.106050

Housing Passport knowledge graph: Promoting a circular economy in urban residential buildings

2024· article· en· W4405356786 on OpenAlexaffabout
Naomi Keena, Avi Friedman, Mojtaba Parsaee, Madeline Mussio, Ava Klein, Martha Pomasonco-Alvis, Paulo Pinheiro

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainable Cities and Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Cities and Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCircular economyArchitectural engineeringBusinessEnvironmental planningGeographyCivil engineeringEconomic geographyEngineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Data-driven circular economy decision-making promotes sustainable housing. • Housing Passports (HP) support circularity by standardizing housing characteristics. • HP knowledge graph (HPKG) contextualizes and semantically links heterogenous data. • HPKG supports the scalability and interoperability of housing data. • 62 million housing datapoints across various scales and contexts are presented. This paper introduces the Housing Passport knowledge graph (HPKG) as a novel digital standardization framework with a robust semantic data infrastructure to promote a circular economy in the home-building industry. Unstandardized and dispersed housing data impedes a comprehensive assessment of housing stock characteristics and life cycle impacts, hindering the implementation of circular economy principles. The HPKG addresses this challenge by providing (1) a standardized framework for integrated analysis of residential buildings’ affordability and circularity across various spatiotemporal scales and socioeconomic contexts, and (2) a scalable semantic infrastructure using web ontologies that enhances the sharability, searchability, readability, and interoperability of housing-related data. A case study involving five Canadian cities demonstrates the HPKG's effectiveness in semantically linking and standardizing approximately 62 million data points representing over 1.2 million residential buildings. The results show how the HPKG enables a multi-scale integrated assessment of Canadian housing stock, focusing on affordability, energy efficiency, and environmental footprints. As a key conclusion, the HPKG supports informed decisions regarding housing stock by enabling the exploration of circular economy scenarios that prioritize the reuse and recycling of residential building materials. The HPKG empowers stakeholders to develop residential typologies that promote affordability, circularity, and sustainability across diverse socioeconomic contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSustainable Cities and SocietySame topicSmart Cities and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207