MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405356786 · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2024.106050

Housing Passport knowledge graph: Promoting a circular economy in urban residential buildings

2024· article· en· W4405356786 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainable Cities and Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Cities and Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCircular economyArchitectural engineeringBusinessEnvironmental planningGeographyCivil engineeringEconomic geographyEngineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Data-driven circular economy decision-making promotes sustainable housing. • Housing Passports (HP) support circularity by standardizing housing characteristics. • HP knowledge graph (HPKG) contextualizes and semantically links heterogenous data. • HPKG supports the scalability and interoperability of housing data. • 62 million housing datapoints across various scales and contexts are presented. This paper introduces the Housing Passport knowledge graph (HPKG) as a novel digital standardization framework with a robust semantic data infrastructure to promote a circular economy in the home-building industry. Unstandardized and dispersed housing data impedes a comprehensive assessment of housing stock characteristics and life cycle impacts, hindering the implementation of circular economy principles. The HPKG addresses this challenge by providing (1) a standardized framework for integrated analysis of residential buildings’ affordability and circularity across various spatiotemporal scales and socioeconomic contexts, and (2) a scalable semantic infrastructure using web ontologies that enhances the sharability, searchability, readability, and interoperability of housing-related data. A case study involving five Canadian cities demonstrates the HPKG's effectiveness in semantically linking and standardizing approximately 62 million data points representing over 1.2 million residential buildings. The results show how the HPKG enables a multi-scale integrated assessment of Canadian housing stock, focusing on affordability, energy efficiency, and environmental footprints. As a key conclusion, the HPKG supports informed decisions regarding housing stock by enabling the exploration of circular economy scenarios that prioritize the reuse and recycling of residential building materials. The HPKG empowers stakeholders to develop residential typologies that promote affordability, circularity, and sustainability across diverse socioeconomic contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.788

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it