Finite Element Analyses of Burst Capacities of Pipelines Containing Pinhole-in-Corrosion Defects
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study investigates the burst capacity of pipelines containing pinhole-in-corrosion (PIC) defects through elastoplastic three-dimensional finite element analyses (FEA) and quantify the extent to which the burst capacity of the PIC defect is affected by sizes of the corresponding pinhole and general corrosion anomaly and the relative position of the pinhole within the corrosion anomaly. The PIC defect in this study is idealized as a cylindrical-shaped pinhole located within a cuboidal-shaped general corrosion anomaly. Results of extensive parametric FEA reveal that, in general, the burst capacity decreases as the pinhole depth increases; however, the bust capacity is insensitive to the diameter the pinhole. The location of the pinhole is found to be a significant factor, with pinholes closer to the edge of the general corrosion having a smaller impact on the burst capacity, while a pinhole at the center of the general corrosion can greatly impact the burst capacity. The pinhole location effect is explained by considering the impact of the bulging effect on the burst capacity of PIC. The outcomes of the study provide the basis for developing an accurate, practical burst capacity model for pipelines containing PIC defects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it