MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405366611 · doi:10.26786/1920-7603(2024)796

New ecological insights on wild pollinator Andrena hesperia

2024· article· en· W4405366611 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emanuele Luigi Zenga, Giovanni Cilia, Marco d’Agostino, Laura Zavatta, Rosa Ranalli, Laura Bortolotti, Simone Flaminio

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pollination Ecology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyEcologyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A nesting aggregation of Andrena hesperia in Bologna (Italy) was studied to characterize this bee’s ecology, phenology and interactions with the environment. Andrena hesperia adults emerged between the end of March and the middle of April, displaying univoltine, protandrous phenology. The average resistance to heat stupor of A. hesperia females was 42.53 ± 13.77 minutes at 40°C. Parasites Nomada facilis and Bombylius canescens were associated with the nests. DNA barcode sequences (COI gene) of A. hesperia and N. facilis were sequenced and deposited in GenBank. The gut microbiota of newly emerged individuals was dominated by Bacillota (Lactobacillus and Fructobacillus) and Pseudomonadota (Snodgrassella alvei and Gilliamella). The pollen carried by A. hesperia females was identified morphologically as belonging for the most part to the Asteraceae family. The pathogens detected on A. hesperia showed different infection loads in newly-emerged individuals and foraging adults. This is the first time that comprehensive information on A. hesperia is reported, and it will hopefully foster further studies on this wild bee.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pollination EcologySame topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207