MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405371948 · doi:10.54891/2786-7013-2024-2-12

TEACHER'S VOICE AS AN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCEIN PEDAGOGICAL AND SOCIAL ASPECTS

2024· article· en· W4405371948 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Oleksandr Tymofieiev, Liubov ANDRIUSHYNA, Yuliia RODINA

Bibliographic record

VenueDnipro Academy of Continuing Education Herald Series Philosophy Pedagogy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology of Development and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTone (literature)PedagogyPower (physics)AutonomyReading (process)PsychologyMathematics educationSociologyLinguisticsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article deals with voice as an educational resource of a teacher in pedagogical and social aspects. In the first part of the article, based on the analysis of scientific and pedagogical literature, the main requirements for the teacher's voice are highlighted, and recommendations for voice preservation are introduced, since about 50% of the teacher's working time is spent directly on the active work of the vocal apparatus. The article also presents the results of the role of teacher's voice tone in pedagogical practice conducted in 2022 by researchers from the Universities of Essex and Reading, who found that teacher's voice tone can change the psycho-emotional state in the classroom. According to the study, a tone that supports students' autonomy and increases their level of activity proved to be favorable for learning. The second part of the article discusses the social aspect of the teacher's voice. In this regard, the authors refer to the scientific works of representatives of such an alternative educational direction as critical pedagogy (P. Freire, G. Giroux, J. Winks, P. McLaren). The position of the Canadian American scholar P. McLaren is analyzed, that illustrates the two types of power with which the voice of the teacher is associated: despotic power, when the teacher's voice subordinates the experience and beliefs of students, and democratic power, which gives the student's voice the opportunity to express themselves, to declare their values and beliefs. The opinion of another representative of this field, J. Winks, is described. The researcher notes that our voices are important in pedagogical practice because they express what we have come through and experienced in life. In this regard, three aspects have been identified as crucial to the formation of a teacher's voice: political relations of power, the inner voice of personal pedagogical experience, and public policy. The conclusions note that the teacher's voice acts not only as an educational resource, but also as an instrument of social change. The teacher's voice can bring the discourse of freedom to the pedagogical process. The teacher's voice is not only subject to public policy, but is also an important tool in its implementation – in particular, in patriotic education, in shaping the culture of thinking and affirming democratic values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDnipro Academy of Continuing Education Herald Series Philosophy PedagogySame topicPsychology of Development and EducationFrench-language works237,207