TEACHER'S VOICE AS AN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCEIN PEDAGOGICAL AND SOCIAL ASPECTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article deals with voice as an educational resource of a teacher in pedagogical and social aspects. In the first part of the article, based on the analysis of scientific and pedagogical literature, the main requirements for the teacher's voice are highlighted, and recommendations for voice preservation are introduced, since about 50% of the teacher's working time is spent directly on the active work of the vocal apparatus. The article also presents the results of the role of teacher's voice tone in pedagogical practice conducted in 2022 by researchers from the Universities of Essex and Reading, who found that teacher's voice tone can change the psycho-emotional state in the classroom. According to the study, a tone that supports students' autonomy and increases their level of activity proved to be favorable for learning. The second part of the article discusses the social aspect of the teacher's voice. In this regard, the authors refer to the scientific works of representatives of such an alternative educational direction as critical pedagogy (P. Freire, G. Giroux, J. Winks, P. McLaren). The position of the Canadian American scholar P. McLaren is analyzed, that illustrates the two types of power with which the voice of the teacher is associated: despotic power, when the teacher's voice subordinates the experience and beliefs of students, and democratic power, which gives the student's voice the opportunity to express themselves, to declare their values and beliefs. The opinion of another representative of this field, J. Winks, is described. The researcher notes that our voices are important in pedagogical practice because they express what we have come through and experienced in life. In this regard, three aspects have been identified as crucial to the formation of a teacher's voice: political relations of power, the inner voice of personal pedagogical experience, and public policy. The conclusions note that the teacher's voice acts not only as an educational resource, but also as an instrument of social change. The teacher's voice can bring the discourse of freedom to the pedagogical process. The teacher's voice is not only subject to public policy, but is also an important tool in its implementation – in particular, in patriotic education, in shaping the culture of thinking and affirming democratic values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".