MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405374341 · doi:10.2147/bctt.s479384

A Prospective Tumour Marker for Breast Cancer: YWHAB and Its Role in Promoting Oncogenic Phenotypes

2024· article· en· W4405374341 on OpenAlexaff
Vaishnavi L Gopaul, Lacey Winstone, Beatrice G Gatien, Braydon Nault, Sujit Maiti, Reid Morgan Opperman, Mousumi Majumder

Bibliographic record

VenueBreast Cancer Targets and Therapy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topic14-3-3 protein interactions
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenotypeBreast cancerCancerOncologyProspective cohort studyMedicineCancer researchInternal medicinePathologyBiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: YWHAB (14-3-3 Beta) was found in the secretome of miR-526b and miR-655 overexpressed breast cancer (BRCA) cell lines. The potential of YWHAB as a therapeutic target or biomarker for BRCA is investigated here. Methods: After YWHAB was knocked down with siRNA, BRCA cell lines were used for in vitro assays (proliferation, migration, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition). In silico analysis and in situ validation with BRCA plasma and biopsy tissues were used to test YWHAB’s biomarker potential. Results: YWHAB RNA and protein expression are elevated in aggressive BRCA cell lines, and the knockdown of YWHAB inhibited cell migration, proliferation, and EMT in all subtypes of tumour cell lines. YWHAB expression is significantly higher in BRCA biopsy tissue and blood plasma compared to control tissues and benign plasmas. YWHAB is expressed in all hormonal subtypes of BRCA tumours and has shown increased expression in advanced tumour stages. Its high expression is linked to poor patient survival. YWHAB is a sensitivity tumour marker (AUC of 0.7340, p = 0.0012) but is not a promising blood biomarker. Nevertheless, combined with pri-miR-526b, YWHAB mRNA expression shows potential as a BRCA blood biomarker (AUC of 0.711, p = 0.032), which must be validated in a larger sample set. Conclusion: We elucidate the novel role of YWHAB as a therapeutic target in BRCA, given that its inhibition mitigated aggressive phenotypes across all tumour subtypes, including triple-negative breast cancer. Furthermore, YWHAB emerges as a potential tumour marker, exhibiting high expression in metastatic BRCA and correlating with poor patient survival; however, it is not a sensitive blood biomarker. Keywords: breast cancer, microRNA, miRNA, miR-526b, miR-655, YWHAB, 14-3-3 Beta, biomarker, migration, epithelial to mesenchymal transition, proliferation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBreast Cancer Targets and TherapySame topic14-3-3 protein interactionsFrench-language works237,207