MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405374406 · doi:10.3390/s24247960

On the Feasibility of Detecting Faults and Irregularities in On-Load Tap Changers (OLTCs) by Vibroacoustic Signal Analysis

2024· article· en· W4405374406 on OpenAlexafffund
Hassan Ezzaidi, I. Fofana, Patrick Picher, Michel Gauvin

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHydro-Québec
KeywordsTransformerRobustness (evolution)Reliability engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringVoltageElectronic engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unlike traditional tap changers, which require transformers to be de-energized before making changes, On-Load Tap Changers (OLTCs) can adjust taps while the transformer is in service, ensuring continuous power supply during voltage regulation. OLTCs enhance grid reliability and support load balancing, reducing strain on the network and optimizing power quality. Their importance has grown as the demand for stable voltage and the integration of renewables has increased, making them vital for modern and resilient power systems. While enhanced OLTCs often incorporate stronger materials and improved designs, mechanical components like contacts and diverter switches can still experience wear over time. This can result in longer maintenance intervals. In the era of digitalization, advanced diagnostic techniques capable of detecting early signs of wear or malfunction are essential to enable preventive maintenance for these important components. This contribution introduces a novel method for detecting faults and irregularities in OLTCs, leveraging vibroacoustic signals to enhance OLTC diagnostics. This paper proposes a tolerance-based approach using the envelope of vibroacoustic signals to identify faults. A significant challenge in this field is the limited availability of faulty signal data, which hinders the performance of machine learning algorithms. To address this, this study introduces a nonlinear model utilizing amplitude modulation with a Gaussian carrier to simulate faults by introducing controlled distortions. The dataset used in this study, with data recorded under real operating conditions from 2016 to 2023, is free of anomalies, providing a robust foundation for the analysis. The results demonstrate a marked improvement in the robustness of detecting simulated faults, offering a promising solution for enhancing OLTC diagnostics and preventive maintenance in modern power systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicPower Transformer Diagnostics and InsulationFrench-language works237,207