MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405378203 · doi:10.1079/9781800625136.0020

Bison and Deer Handling and Transport

2024· book-chapter· en· W4405378203 on OpenAlexaff
John S. Church, J. K. Galbraith, Pete Goddard

Bibliographic record

VenueCABI eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsThompson Rivers University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bison and deer are both relatively new farmed species in North America, while deer have been reared in Europe for centuries. Improvements in human–animal interactions when working with bison and deer have resulted in better safety for handlers and enhancement of animal welfare. Regular exposure to calm handlers and training of both species to move smoothly through facilities is beneficial. Handling systems work best when they take advantage of the animals’ natural behavioural tendencies to return to where they came from. All people working with bison and deer should be adequately trained (including in relation to human and animal safety); in some countries, this is required by legislation, welfare codes and industry guidance. This chapter covers best handling and transport practices for bison, red deer, wapiti and other deer species, where relevant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score0.546

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCABI eBooksSame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207