Effects of short‐term exposure to moderate amounts of alcohol on brain volume
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: Although numerous studies have reported that chronic alcohol consumption causes brain volume reduction and cerebrospinal fluid volume increase, few studies have examined the acute effects of alcohol on brain structure. This study aims to investigate the short-term brain volume changes following alcohol administration. METHODS: Moderate doses of alcohol were administered intravenously to 18 healthy volunteers for a total of 90 min to achieve a blood alcohol concentration of 0.5 mg/mL. An alcohol clamp method combined with physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling was used to achieve fine control over blood alcohol concentration. T1 images with 3T MRI were scanned at three time points: baseline, 0 min, and 90 min after the end of alcohol administration. Cortical, subcortical, and ventricular volumes were computed after segmentation with FreeSurfer. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate longitudinal changes in brain volume at 96 regions. RESULTS: Acute alcohol administration increased bilateral lateral ventricular volumes, which lasted until 90 min after the end of alcohol injection. On the other hand, the volumes of total gray matter, left precentral cortex, left caudal middle frontal cortex, and left superior frontal cortex decreased after alcohol administration, but these changes disappeared 90 min after the end of alcohol administration. CONCLUSION: Acute injection of moderate doses of alcohol may enlarge ventricle volumes and reduce gray matter volumes. The transient volume changes caused by acute administration of alcohol may be related to changes in CSF flow and water content of brain tissue, which warrants further study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".