MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405383706 · doi:10.1111/anae.16494

Mechanisms underlying neurocognitive dysfunction following critical illness: a systematic review

2024· review· en· W4405383706 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark Andonovic, Holly A. Morrison, William Allingham, Robert Adam, Martin Shaw, Tara Quasim, Joanne McPeake, Terence J. Quinn

Bibliographic record

VenueAnaesthesia · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of GlasgowAstraZeneca
KeywordsNeurocognitiveMedicineCognitionEtiologyNeuroimagingPsychiatryHyperintensityCritical illnessClinical psychologyIntensive care medicineCritically illMagnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Cognitive impairment is a significant healthcare problem globally and its prevalence is projected to affect over 150 million people worldwide. Survivors of critical illness are impacted frequently by long-term neurocognitive dysfunction regardless of presenting illness, but the mechanisms are poorly understood. The goal of this review was to synthesise the existing evidence regarding potential mechanisms underlying neurocognitive dysfunction following critical illness in order to guide potential avenues for future research. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the literature for studies published between 1 January 1974 and 15 July 2023. We included publications involving adult patients with critical illness due to any aetiology that assessed for cognitive impairment following recovery from illness, and explored or investigated potential underlying causative mechanisms. The quality and risk of bias of the individual studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: Of the 7658 reviewed references, 37 studies comprising 4344 patients were selected for inclusion. Most studies were single centre with sample sizes of < 100 patients. The proportion of patients with long-term cognitive impairment ranged from 13% to 100%. A wide variety of theoretical mechanisms were explored, with biomarkers and neuroimaging utilised most frequently. Many studies reported associations between investigated mechanisms and reduced cognition; several of these mechanisms have been implicated in other forms of long-term neurodegenerative conditions. Increased levels of inflammatory cytokines during acute illness and white matter hyperintensities on neuroimaging following recovery were the associations reported most commonly. DISCUSSION: The underlying pathophysiology of neurocognitive decline after critical illness is not yet understood fully. The mechanisms implicated in other neurodegenerative conditions suggest that this may represent an accelerated version of the same processes. Large scale studies are required to further elucidate the cause of this significant problem for survivors of critical illness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnaesthesiaSame topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersFrench-language works237,207