MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405394190 · doi:10.15407/geotm2024.168.121

Prospects for developing the hydrocarbon potential of deposits of heavy high-viscosity oil, petroleum bitumen, residual oil and falling condensate in the subsoils of Ukraine

2024· article· en· W4405394190 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeo-Technical mechanics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining and Gasification Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphaltPetroleumResidual oilHydrocarbonPetroleum engineeringFalling (accident)ResidualEnvironmental scienceViscosityGeologyChemistryMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hydrocarbon potential of heavy high-viscosity oil and natural bitumens (malthas, asphalts, asphaltites) remains practically unexplored and uncertain. At the same time, oil and gas promising areas make up more than 80 % of the territory of Ukraine. Also, an important source of hydrocarbons is non-extractable reserves of residual oil and retrograde gas condensate. Based on this, the purpose of the work was to substantiate the technologies of their development. The objects of the research are the geological conditions of occurrence of heavy high-viscosity oils and petroleum bitumens in Ukraine and promising technologies for their development. On the basis of an in-depth analysis of the features of the formation, occurrence and distribution of deposits of heavy high-viscosity oil and petroleum bitumen, as well as an analysis of the existing methods of their extraction, the work solved the problem of choosing the most effective development technologies for the deposits of Ukraine. Since, according to the results of the analysis, deposits of heavy high-viscosity oil and petroleum bitumen were discovered in Ukraine in the intervals of occurrence of 800–1500 m and 200–500 m (shallow-lying deposits in the composition of sandy sediments), it was proposed for these intervals that the most effective is, respectively, the technology of cyclic steam stimulation in combination with catalytic aquathermolysis. Currently, deposits of high-viscosity oils and natural bitumen are not developed in Ukraine, and, moreover, level of geological study of their resources is extremely low. Therefore, pilot projects of their development are proposed to be implemented in already developed oil fields. The choice of these technologies is justified as follows: 1) the technology of cyclic steam stimulation in combination with catalytic aquathermolysis is expedient to implement on already developed deposits where production is carried out, though the extraction rate of heavy oil is low (with minimal investment and maximum profitability); 2) in view of the accumulated experience in the development of bituminous sand deposits (Alberta, Canada) and having in Ukraine a number of promising deposits similar in depth and type of bedding, it is possible to implement steam gravity drainage technology or its modifications. Keywords: heavy high-viscosity oil, petroleum bitumen, production technologies, cyclic steam stimulation, well hydraulic production, catalytic aquathermolysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it