Portraits et rhapsodie : les figures de femmes dans Les Historiettes de Tallemant des Réaux
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our thesis proposes to shed light on the composition of Tallemant des Réaux's Historiettes, between portraits and rhapsody, through the prism of the figuration of women. This is not a juxtaposition of meaning that would be fortuitous or contingent : our po stulate is on the contrary that the relationship of the two modes of narrative and representation is essential and profoundly dynamic. Tallemant des Réaux is certainly the product of a metis culture and the attendance of social salons, spaces where the emp ire of women is exercised, partly determines it ; women abound in the Historiettes , but in return female figures nourish and legitimize the word of an author who seeks his voice.The issue at hand is to show that female figures, as they are evoked, highlight the representations and contradictory voices that form the threads of the contexture of the text. Deeply ambiguous, the Historiettes oscillate between beautiful gallantry, the art of pleasing women, and the more masculine Gauloiserie that gladly mocks t heir weaknesses. Such tensions raise the question of gallantry anew and question the role of women in regime change in modes of representation. Set in the middle of the century, the Historiettes operate a gallant adaptation of the ancient tradition of live s, essentially masculine that does not go without tensions. One cannot imagine that only Gauloiserie dominates in the work and if obscenity is not absent, it is a question of looking for the invisible correspondences woven with the epic. Indeed, the use of figures of evidence and the transfiguration of a triad of women models of gallant aesthetics implies Tallemant's reconfiguration of androcentric and androcratic social cartography
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".