MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405402944 · doi:10.2196/64254

Unveiling the Frailty Spatial Patterns Among Chilean Older Persons by Exploring Sociodemographic and Urbanistic Influences Based on Geographic Information Systems: Cross-Sectional Study

2024· article· en· W4405402944 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yony Ormazábal, Diego Arauna, Juan Carlos Cantillana, Iván Palomo, Eduardo Fuentes, Carlos Mena

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Aging · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreprintGerontologyGeographyDemographyEnvironmental healthPsychologyMedicineSociologyComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Frailty syndrome increases the vulnerability of older adults. The growing proportion of older adults highlights the need to better understand the factors contributing to the prevalence of frailty. Current evidence suggests that geomatic tools integrating geolocation can provide valuable information for implementing preventive measures by enhancing the urban physical environment. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between various elements of the urban physical environment and the level of frailty syndrome in older Chilean people. Methods: A cohort of 251 adults aged 65 years or older from Talca City, Chile, underwent comprehensive medical assessments and were geographically mapped within a Geographic Information Systems database. Frailty was determined using the Fried frailty criteria. The spatial analysis of the frailty was conducted in conjunction with layers depicting urban physical facilities within the city, including vegetables and fruit shops, senior centers or communities, pharmacies, emergency health centers, main squares and parks, family or community health centers, and sports facilities such as stadiums. Results: The studied cohort was composed of 187 women and 64 men, with no significant differences in age and BMI between genders. Frailty prevalence varied significantly across clusters, with Cluster 3 showing the highest prevalence (14/47, P=.01). Frail individuals resided significantly closer to emergency health centers (960 [SE 904] m vs 1352 [SE 936] m, P=.04), main squares/parks (1550 [SE 130] m vs. 2048 [SE 105] m, P=.03), and sports fields (3040 [SE 236] m vs 4457 [SE 322]m, P=.04) compared with nonfrail individuals. There were no significant differences in urban quality index across frailty groups, but frail individuals lived in areas with higher population density (0.013 [SE 0.001] vs 0.01 [SE 0.0007], P=.03). Conclusions: Frail individuals exhibit geospatial patterns suggesting intentional proximity to health facilities, sports venues, and urban facilities, revealing associations with adaptive responses to frailty and socioeconomic factors. This highlights the crucial intersection of urban environments and frailty, which is important for geriatric medicine and public health initiatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR AgingSame topicFrailty in Older AdultsFrench-language works237,207