MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405407733 · doi:10.70860/rtg.v13i30.17670

OCUPAÇÕES URBANAS E TERRITORIALIDADE COMO INSURGÊNCIA DO COMUM

2024· article· pt· W4405407733 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sandro Ferreira Pinto, Braz Batista Vas, João Bosco Moura Tonucci Filho

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Tocantinense de Geografia · 2024
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Development and Societal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As ocupações urbanas para fins de moradia surgem como reações ao modelo de segregação socioespacial imposto pelo mercado imobiliário e pelas regras urbanísticas estatais. Nosso campo de estudo situa-se em duas dessas ocupações, Jardim Deus é Fiel e Alto Bonito, ambas em Araguaína, Tocantins. Sob a metodologia de pesquisa-ação, investigamos a autogestão e a autonomia das comunidades enquanto experiência do comum, alternativa ao Estado e ao mercado. Animados pela obra de Dardot e Laval e Hardt e Negri, pensamos o comum entre o político e o biopolítico. Finalizamos discutindo as ocupações como territórios e buscando relações teóricas entre o comum urbano e territorialidade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Tocantinense de GeografiaSame topicUrban Development and Societal IssuesFrench-language works237,207