Comparative assessment of groundwater quality in Kokrajhar, India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A study was carried out to analyse and compare the quality of groundwater in Kokrajhar during the pre- and post-monsoon seasons. Kokrajhar is experiencing a significant population growth and urbanisation. Groundwater is vital for the daily activities and consumption of the local population. In order to meet the needs of the local population, it is crucial to evaluate the quality of groundwater. The study involved the collection of groundwater samples from 20 different locations during the pre- and post-monsoon periods. Tests were conducted on groundwater samples to analyse 10 different test parameters. Sample points were located using geographical information system (GIS) and contour maps were generated to represent different test parameters. The assessment of groundwater quality was determined using two different methodologies: the Weighted Arithmetic Index (WAI) method and the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Water Quality Index (CCME WQI) method. The results obtained by both methods were compared. Minor to significant variations in various test parameters were observed during analysis of pre- and post-monsoon groundwater samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".