MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405429477 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3517733

CochleaSpecNet: An Attention Based Dual Branch Hybrid CNN-GRU Network for Speech Emotion Recognition Using Cochleagram and Spectrogram

2024· article· en· W4405429477 on OpenAlexaffabout
Atkia Namey, Khadija Akter, Md. Azad Hossain, M. Ali Akber Dewan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectrogramSpeech recognitionComputer scienceDual (grammatical number)Emotion recognitionArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Linguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Being one of the main communication medium, speech contains necessary information about the emotional state of a human. Accurate emotion recognition is crucial for enhancing human-machine interactions, highlighting the importance of a strong Speech Emotion Recognition (SER) system. SER system classifies the human emotional state based on speaker’s utterances in different catagories such as sad, happy, neutral, angry, surprise, calm and so on. This research introduces a novel SER approach that utilizes cochleagram and spectrogram features to capture relevant speech patterns for the classifier network. The network integrates a hybrid model that combines Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for feature extraction with Gated Recurrent Units (GRU) to handle temporal dependencies. Furthermore, to improve the performance of this network, a multi-head attention mechanism has been incorporated following the GRU layer. Despite increasing interest in SER, there is a notable lack of studies using Bangla language datasets, revealing a significant gap in current research. To address this gap, evaluation of the model has been conducted on the augmented BanglaSER (Bangla Speech Emotion Recognition) dataset in which the model has achieved a notable accuracy of 92.04% in categorizing five distinct emotions: angry, surprise, happy, neutral, and sad. Additionally, to further evaluate the performance of the SER model, English language based RAVDESS (Ryerson Audio-Visual Database of Emotional Speech) dataset has also been employed into the proposed model. This attempt has provided 82.40% accuracy in classifying eight diverse emotions that includes fear, disgust, calm along with the emotions of BanglaSER. Moreover, a comparative analysis of the proposed model with existing SER approaches is carried out to demonstrate it’s stability and robustness. The incorporation of two individual features as inputs into the attention guided hybrid neural network showcases the efficacy of the proposed SER system, offering a promising approach for precise and efficient emotion categorization from speech signals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207