Toward Native Intelligence: An Efficient and Flexible AI Services Provision Scheme in Multilayer Heterogeneous Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To fulfill future diverse user requirements, 6G networks are envisioned to provide everyone-centric customized services ubiquitously and precisely. However, the diversity in user requirements and the heterogeneity in network resources challenge conventional network operators in network management and service provision. In this article, we investigate the artificial intelligence (AI) service provision in the multilayer heterogeneous network. To provide ubiquitous intelligence to users with different computing requirements, an intelligence-native network architecture is designed. Based on the proposed architecture and the AI model stitching mechanism, we formulate the joint AI provision and access selection problem as a mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problem to maximize the average user satisfaction value and user satisfaction rate. Then, a heuristic solution based on Dung Beetle algorithm is proposed to optimize the AI model selection, AI service deployment, user access, and stitching coefficient jointly. Extensive simulations are conducted to evaluate the performance of our proposed architecture and algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".