Dukungan sosial teman sebaya dengan tingkat quarter life crisis pada individu dewasa awal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This research aims to determine the relationship between peer social support and the level of quarter life crisis in early adult individuals. The subjects of this research were vulnerable individuals aged 19-29 years in the city of Surabaya with a total of 100 respondents. Based on analytical calculations using Spearman Rho, a correlation score of 0.225 was obtained with a significance level of 0.000 (p<0.05), meaning that there was no negative relationship between social support and the quarter life crisis. The result is that the higher the social support an individual has, it has no effect on the level of quarter life crisis experienced by that individual. Keywords: social support, Quarter life crisis, adult individuals Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara dukungan sosial teman sebaya dengan tingkat quarter life crisis pada individu dewasa awal. Subjek penelitian ini adalah individu di rentan usia 19-29 tahun yang ada di kota Surabaya dengan jumlah responden 100 orang. Berdasarkan perhitungan analisis menggunakan Spearman Rho diperoleh skor korelasi Sebesar 0.225 dengan taraf signifikansi sebesar 0.000 (p<0.05) artinya tidak terdapat hubungan negatif antara dukungan sosial dengan quarter life crisis. Hasilnya semakin tinggi dukungan sosial yang dimiliki individu tidak berpengaruh terhadap tingkat quarter life crisis yang dialami oleh individu tersebut. Kata Kunci: Dukungan Sosial, Quarter life crisis, Remaja Awal
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".