Developing Grade 2 Spelling Ability Using the Integrated CIRC Collaborative Learning Technique and Multimedia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to examine the effectiveness of multimedia integrated CIRC learning management plan on grade 2 students’ spelling ability. The research employed a one-group experimental design in which a learning management plan based on CIRC principles, with the integration of multimedia, was used as the main intervention. The participants included 30 grade 2 students selected through clustered random sampling in a suburban province of Thailand. The study utilized a learning management plan comprising eight sub-lesson plans, as well as a spelling test of 30 multiple-choice items. The results analyzed using mean scores, standard deviation, percentages, learning management effectiveness (E1/E2), and a paired samples t-test. The findings revealed significant improvement in students' spelling abilities, with the effectiveness of the learning management plan reaching 84.22/88.77, exceeding the predetermined criteria of 75/75. This study contributes to educational research by demonstrating that multimedia-integrated CIRC is an effective approach for enhancing spelling skills in young learners.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it